ALA Wins Temporary Restraining Order in Lawsuit Fighting the Dismantling of IMLS

A federal judge ruled that the government may not take further action toward dismantling the IMLS, including the mass layoff of employees, while the case is heard.

On Thursday, a federal judge granted a temporary restraining order (TRO) pausing the dismantling of the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) in response to a lawsuit brought by the American Library Association (ALA) and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). The narrow ruling stops the Trump administration from taking further action against the independent federal agency while the case is heard in court. 

Both sides must submit a status report to the court on Tuesday, May 6.

The TRO was issued, in part, because the plaintiffs showed a substantial likelihood of success in the case based on the merits. "The wholesale termination of grants and services and the mass layoffs appear to violate the clear statutory mandates," judge Richard J. Leon wrote.

The decision pauses the mass layoff of IMLS employees, currently on administrative leave, that was to take effect on May 4.

“The immediate halt to the gutting of IMLS is a win for America's libraries and the millions of Americans who rely on them," ALA president Cindy Hohl said in a statement. "ALA is encouraged that the court recognizes the immediacy of the need for IMLS and library services at risk. The temporary restraining order will stop the dismantling of IMLS while the court considers the merits in this case."

[READ: ALA Sues Trump Administration Over Dismantling of IMLS]

EveryLibrary released a statement following the ruling: "EveryLibrary welcomes the decision made on May 1, 2025, by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which granted a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to halt the Trump Administration’s unlawful attempt to dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS).

"This order, aimed at preserving the status quo and restoring operations to their condition prior to March 14, is both appropriate and urgently needed. It reaffirms that IMLS must continue to operate as directed by Congress, including the resumption of Grants to States and other critical grant programs that libraries, museums, and non-profit organizations across the nation depend on.

"We are especially relieved that, under this order, the agency’s dedicated staff will not face mass termination. These public servants, who are responsible for administering federal funding, data collection, and professional development programs, were at risk of unjust dismissal for political reasons. The court’s decision prevents this injustice and provides a path forward while the litigation continues.

"We commend the plaintiffs, the American Library Association (ALA) and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), for taking this bold legal action. We would also like to recognize the outstanding legal team at Democracy Forward for their continued success in defending the rule of law against numerous executive actions.

"This ruling represents a significant victory for the rule of law. This case is not yet concluded, and it proceeds alongside a separate lawsuit brought by 21 State Attorneys General that also challenges the March 14 Executive Order. This multi-front defense of the statutory obligations and FY2025 budget of the Institute of Museum and Library Services is vital for protecting state libraries, public libraries, museums, and non-profit grant recipients."

[READ: The Cost of Losing IMLS Funding]

Read ALA's full press release on the court decision below.

 

Be the first reader to comment.

Comment Policy:
  • Be respectful, and do not attack the author, people mentioned in the article, or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  • Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  • Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.
  • Comments may be republished in print, online, or other forms of media.
  • If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.


RELATED 

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

We are currently offering this content for free. Sign up now to activate your personal profile, where you can save articles for future viewing

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?