So apropos of Vicky’s post, I have to examine my own reactions to the story. First…instantly weary of the “da-dum” narration at the end of every short section. End of section 1, p.5: “Brothers and sisters, the stakes were high.” End of section 2, p.7 “All in all, it’s not a good idea to stir up the wrath of the Sugar Man.” End of section 3, p.9 “You heard me. The DeSoto.” etc. Too frequent, hyper-dramatic and one-note. However….as the story wears on, I get used to it, and think of an adult telling a story to a group, in small chunks, and leaving them at the end of an hour hanging for the next bit, tomorrow. I’m still not sure how I come down on this. It will be what I look for in my re-read.
Second…the story does wear on. The leisurely pace suits the tone and mood; but that leisure taken in such short chunks made it hard for me to stay engaged, and hard to remember where I was in the story. Is this the small-reading-chunks problem? Anyone read this in one long slug? I may need to set myself up for a long-slug re-read.
Despite all that, by the end of the story I felt convinced, satisfied, and having borne witness to something “individually distinct.” A couple of months later, I can’t recall the plot, one iota. But I can recall the interior of the DeSoto as if I were one of the Scouts. Does a Newbery book need to be memorable, or just need to be distinguished on first read? Does it need to be the most distinguished on first read, or might it be one that gets better each time you read it? I’ve seen all of the above garner a medal.
We are currently offering this content for free. Sign up now to activate your personal profile, where you can save articles for future viewing
Be the first reader to comment.
Comment Policy:
Comment should not be empty !!!